If eminent domain is enacted and passes the courts, it will probably prevent the next housing bubble. It will probably completely change how mortgages are underwritten too, higher down payments, higher interest rates, and mortgage eminent domain premiums along with PMI. This is good article to click and read it full.
Why the Industry Cares About this Eminent Domain Thing; Investor Updates
Jul 28 2012, 8:55AM by Rob ChrismanEarlier this week I was in Ontario, visiting the headquarters of a well-run mortgage shop, so this note was very relevant: “Rob, what are you hearing with this eminent domain thing? I am a two-person broker in Iowa – why should I care about what happens up ‘the mortgage food chain’ in California – the land of fruits and nuts?” Remember, the architects of this thing were smart enough to know that they couldn’t pick on the Agencies or GNMA, so they have only picked a fight with SIFMA and left the Goliaths to warily watch and wait from the sidelines. I anticipate that if it goes into effect in San Bernardino, and Ontario and Fontana, then SIFMA would either come out with disclosure requirements around loans in certain geographic areas within pools, or around requiring certain areas to be put in specified and separate pools, or perhaps the rating agencies would take care of it by torpedoing the ratings, or better yet, not rendering a rating on such a pool. So then the loan market dries up because there’s no bid, and then we know what happens next: investors pull out and the borrower pays the price. And one has to ask, “Where is the money coming from to fund this effort?” And what non-agency servicer is going to tell this group that a borrower is behind?
But the use of eminent domain to seize, and then restructure, underwater private-label mortgages would result in more than just losses to private investors. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks are also major investors in private-label securities and they too would suffer if the county took over what is estimated to be 150,000 underwater mortgages. It’s a very bad precedent – just try coordinating that with supposed long-term plans to reduce the government’s role in housing by turning as much as possible over to the private sector. And does it put the county in charge of FHFA? I don’t think the staff would care for that very much. (The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 stipulates that while acting as conservator, FHFA “is not subject to the supervision or direction of any other agency.”) San Bernardino County caused a ruckus with bond investors when it created a Joint Exercise Powers Authority last month in agreement with the cities of Fontana and Ontario to devise a Homeownership Protection Plan. San Francisco venture capital firm Mortgage Resolution Partners, led by CEO Graham Williams, is backing the plan after (per American Banker) it had “pitched the eminent domain proposal to several California cities, singled out performing but underwater loans in private-label securities, in which the borrower is still paying their mortgage but owes more than the home is worth.”
Westminster Overview
| Median home price is $369,000. Based on a rental parity value of $461,000, this market is under valued. |
| Monthly payment affordability has been worsening over the last 2 month(s). Momentum suggests worsening affordability. |
| Resale prices on a $/SF basis increased from $259/SF to $263/SF. |
| Resale prices have been falling for 12 month(s). Price momentum suggests falling prices over the next three months. |
| Median rental rates declined $100 last month from $1,982 to $1,881. |
| Rents have been falling for 3 month(s). Price momentum suggests unchanging rents over the next three months. |
| Market rating = 4 |

Proprietary OC Housing News home purchase analysis 
15740 POINSETTIA Way Westminster, CA 92683
$547,000 …….. Asking Price
$460,000 ………. Purchase Price
10/21/2008 ………. Purchase Date
$87,000 ………. Gross Gain (Loss)
($36,800) ………… Commissions and Costs at 8%
============================================
$50,200 ………. Net Gain (Loss)
============================================
18.9% ………. Gross Percent Change
10.9% ………. Net Percent Change
4.5% ………… Annual Appreciation
Cost of Home Ownership
——————————————————————————
$547,000 …….. Asking Price
$109,400 ………… 20% Down Conventional
3.70% …………. Mortgage Interest Rate
30 ……………… Number of Years
$437,600 …….. Mortgage
$101,613 ………. Income Requirement
$2,014 ………… Monthly Mortgage Payment
$474 ………… Property Tax at 1.04%
………… Mello Roos & Special Taxes
$137 ………… Homeowners Insurance at 0.3%
$0 ………… Private Mortgage Insurance
………… Homeowners Association Fees
============================================
$2,625 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays
($319) ………. Tax Savings
($665) ………. Equity Hidden in Payment
$134 ………….. Lost Income to Down Payment
$157 ………….. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves
============================================
$1,931 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership
Cash Acquisition Demands
——————————————————————————
$6,970 ………… Furnishing and Move In at 1% + $1,500
$6,970 ………… Closing Costs at 1% + $1,500
$4,376 ………… Interest Points
$109,400 ………… Down Payment
============================================
$127,716 ………. Total Cash Costs
$29,600 ………. Emergency Cash Reserves
============================================
$157,316 ………. Total Savings Needed
——————————————————————————————————————————————-
This property is available for sale via the MLS.
Please contact Shevy Akason, #01836707
949.769.1599……
sales@ochousingnews.com…..
We're sorry, but it seems that we're having some problems loading MLS # S705743 from our database. Please check back soon.
|
$759,000 9570 NEWFAME Cir |
0.23 miles 4 bd / 3 ba 2,561 Sq. Ft. |
|
|
$486,700 9392 ENGLAND Ave |
0.39 miles 5 bd / 3.5 ba 2,130 Sq. Ft. |
|
|
$575,000 8842 SAPPHIRE |
0.6 miles 3 bd / 2 ba 2,645 Sq. Ft. |
|
|
$650,000 8702 BERMUDA Ave |
0.71 miles 6 bd / 3 ba 2,619 Sq. Ft. |
|
|
$549,999 8641 South DEL RAY Cir |
0.76 miles 4 bd / 2.5 ba 2,099 Sq. Ft. |
|
|
$689,900 16537 ELM |
0.8 miles 4 bd / 3 ba 2,055 Sq. Ft. |
|
|
$699,000 16583 TEAK Cir |
0.88 miles 5 bd / 3 ba 2,145 Sq. Ft. |
|
|
$499,000 15861 LAS SOLANAS St |
1.07 miles 4 bd / 2 ba 2,101 Sq. Ft. |
|
|
$700,000 9814 PETUNIA Ave |
1.07 miles 4 bd / 2.5 ba 2,101 Sq. Ft. |
|
|
$779,000 16889 HELENA Cir |
1.16 miles 4 bd / 2.5 ba 2,412 Sq. Ft. |
Sign up for the OC Housing News monthly market newsletter.
See the enormous foreclosure pipeline for yourself below. Enter location and press search. Scroll through list by pressing "next."
We provide detailed information on any property.















And the beat goes on…
June Sees 60,000 Completed Foreclosures: CoreLogic
In June, 60,000 homes turned into completed foreclosures compared to 80,000 foreclosures a year ago, CoreLogic reported Tuesday.
The analytics company stated the yearly drop puts completed foreclosures at 2007 levels. Month-over-month, there was no reported change in completed foreclosures for June. Since September 2008, 3.7 million homes have been lost to foreclosure.
“The decline in the flow of completed foreclosures to pre-financial crisis levels is more welcome news pointing to an emerging housing market recovery,” said Anand Nallathambi, president and CEO of CoreLogic. “However, we believe even more can be done to reduce the inventory of foreclosures by decreasing the level of regulatory uncertainty and expanding alternatives to foreclosure.”
The number of homes in national foreclosure inventory in June stood at 1.4 million, or 3.4 percent of all homes with a mortgage. June’s figure is a slight drop from a year ago when the total was 1.5 million, or 3.5 percent. From May, the figure was unchanged. CoreLogic defines foreclosure inventory as the share of all mortgaged homes in some stage of the foreclosure process.
“While completed foreclosures and real-estate owned (REO) sales virtually offset each other over the past four months, producing static levels of foreclosure inventory for most of this year, they are beginning to diverge again,” said Mark Fleming, chief economist for CoreLogic. “Over the last two months REO sales declined while completed foreclosures leveled out. So we could see foreclosure inventory rising going forward.”
The states that saw the highest number of completed foreclosures over a one-year period since June 2012 were California, leading with 125,000, followed by Florida (91,000), Michigan (58,000), Texas (56,000) and Georgia (55,000).
The top five states accounted for 48.4 percent of all completed foreclosures nationally.
Florida (11.5 percent) led as the state with the highest share of inventory in foreclosure, with New Jersey (6.5 percent), New York (5.1 percent), Illinois (5.0 percent), and Nevada (4.8 percent) taking the next four spots.